0
Some ridiculous provocative questions. Do you believe it's acceptable to sell. If the copyright holder considers it unacceptable, they can easily submit a request and the model will be removed. Everyone decides for themselves whether to sell under an editorial, custom or royalty-free license, changing brand names, or something else.
Then, how people sell Minions model ? https://www.cgtrader.com/search?keywords=Minions
Just like everyone else. Although such models are recommended to be sold under an editorial license.
Why only "recommended"? It should be strict rule that all branded models should be sold only under editorial licence. On the other marketplace the editorial licence is assigned automatically when anything branded (for example in product description) is detected and artist cannot it change. And it is problem of CGT there here is total anarchy in licencing and nobody is controlling it.
zabotlama, well https://www.cgtrader.com/3d-models/vehicle/train/caf-urbos-budapest I hope you have an agreement with CAF (https://www.caf.net)?
Oh my mistake I will of course change the license to editorial. But Ideal solution would be if CGT did it automatically. It is my older model when I was not so beware of these things now I strictly give editorial license to all branded models.
.
Copyright holder still has the right to make a claim against you (or anyone else who has similar models) even if you make the model free. Especially considering logos on the model. So, for example, by implementing forced transition to editorial licenses, everyone will be happy that now nothing is in danger but suddenly some solid car brand will appear with “Hi! What, are you having fun? Haha! Delete all immediately! ” And what's the point?
